Tuesday, December 14, 2010

India: Only for Haves

"There are a large number of unauthorised colonies. the migrants settle there carry a kind of behaviour which is unacceptable in any modern city. so crimes do take place". -- Mr.P.Chidambaram, Home Minister.

Thank you Mr.P.Chidambaram, for finally letting the cat out of the bag, that India, in the post-liberalisation era is only for the Haves and the Have-nots do not have any right here. Will the Hon'ble Home Minister kindly clarify how many migrant laborers living in the cursed colonies are moving in Posh Cars?

If the crime of abducting and raping a girl is because of the migrants, then, dear Home Minister, will you please enlighten us why the migrants should be living in the colonies when they have cars to move on?

On the other hand, the utterance of Home Minister must refer to the girl who was gang-raped, who happened to be from the colonies. When Edmund was asked why he climbed the Everest, he replied "Because it was there". In the same way, the gang-rape was committed because the girl was there. If the girl from the colony was not there, which is a "kind of behaviour which is unacceptable in any modern society", there would not have been any rape at all.

In the post-liberalisation era, India is segregated into two: The colonies and the Colonists (of native breed).

Our beloved Home Minister must realise that only these colonies gave him the power and the Colonists can always derive power from whoever is in authority, PC or no PC.

Thank You Madam

"Do not denigrate the office of Prime Minister" UPA chairperson tells the Opposition Party BJP. Thank you Madam, for the concern you have for the highest office of the country. But Chanakyan wonders where was this regard for the PM when so called consultants and Media people were deciding portfolios and the cabinet. In the West-Minister model of government, it is the prerogative of the Prime Minister, as the first among the equals, to decide his cabinet. But what happened in 2009? It was Radia and the Media, allies, everyone and anyone, except the Prime Minister, who decided the Cabinet. Where was the dignity of the office of the PM then Madam?

Or is it because our Honest PM was busy with international problems that he outsourced the Cabinet formation to talented consultants? By the way, you have told several times that our PM is honest in every fora. Chanakyan has got a doubt Madam. Why you didnt say the same in case of Shri.A.Raja? Why you dont want to declare him Honest Madam?

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Everyone was wondering whether the assessment of U S Ambassador to India were correct and unbiased. Take the cable of "Congress politicizing 26/11 attacks for Vote Bank politics". Chanakya too did not believe in the assessment capacity of the Ambassador but Chanakya was proved wrong. Thanks to Digvijay singh, within days of the leak of Cable, Diggy is once again reiterating his comment about Hindu Terrorists being a threat to Karkare. Now, there is no doubt that the Congress will stoop to any level to cling on to Power and play vote bank politics by caste and religion. Or, is it your way of hitting back at the high-command for keeping you out of any post for so long, Mr.Diggy?